Diplomatic Practice – Analysis and Strategic Review of Correspondence Subject: Integrating Surveillance Systems into International Diplomacy: A Diplomatic Letter from Prof. Muharrem Shabani 1. Introduction and Institutional Identity The letter begins with a strong and respectful tone, identifying the sender: Prof. Muharrem Shabani, a distinguished academic and diplomat. Roles include: Professor of History and Geopolitics of the Balkans at ISMTS (Switzerland), Ambassador for Peace (UN context), Founder and President of the SKUN Foundation, which advocates for Kosovo’s recognition at the United Nations. This opening sets the diplomatic context and introduces the sender’s credentials, lending authority and purpose to the correspondence. 2. Strategic Relevance of Surveillance Systems The letter successfully draws a conceptual bridge between public health surveillance systems and diplomatic intelligence. Key points include: Surveillance systems are essential not only in epidemiology but also in political and diplomatic strategy. The author intelligently positions surveillance as a tool for geopolitical insight, essential for: Tracking political and social changes, Supporting diplomatic narratives, such as Kosovo’s bid for UN recognition. This expands the scope of surveillance from a technical/public health instrument to a geopolitical and diplomatic tool, a valuable shift in perspective. 3. Value of the Johns Hopkins University Course The letter demonstrates a deep appreciation for the Johns Hopkins course on “Surveillance Systems: The Building Blocks”, linking it to: Broader geopolitical applications, Theoretical and applied diplomacy, Advocacy work (especially in post-conflict or under-recognized states like Kosovo). This reflects not just academic engagement but also pragmatic interest in knowledge transfer. 4. Role of the SKUN Foundation and Prof. Shabani's Diplomacy A critical part of the letter is the emphasis on the SKUN Foundation’s mission: Diplomatic engagement for Kosovo’s recognition, Promotion of peace and dialogue via NGO diplomacy, Integration of data and education to support peaceful statehood aspirations. This section elevates the SKUN Foundation as a non-state diplomatic actor, reinforcing modern diplomacy’s pluralistic landscape. 5. Relevance to Global Geopolitical Challenges By highlighting the recognition of Kosovo as a case study, the letter naturally transitions into: The broader geopolitical need for coordinated systems of information (like surveillance), The interconnection between health, security, and state legitimacy, The call for data-driven diplomacy. This gives the letter both academic depth and real-world urgency. 6. Call for Collaboration The conclusion is open and diplomatically sound. However, a few enhancements could be proposed: Include a clear call-to-action, e.g., a request for a follow-up meeting, webinar, or research dialogue. Propose a joint research project or knowledge exchange program, possibly between Johns Hopkins and SKUN Foundation. This transforms goodwill into actionable diplomacy. Recommendations for Further Diplomatic Refinement To enhance your diplomatic practice and written expression further: Strengthen the Link Between Surveillance and Diplomacy with Real Examples E.g., cite how WHO surveillance influenced travel bans or how intelligence from surveillance helped shape post-war peacebuilding efforts. Use Diplomatic Language Strategically Introduce expressions such as: “We see a unique opportunity to converge our missions…” “It would be an honor to explore collaborative pathways…” Personalization of the Message Tailor the letter to its recipient by referring to specific professors, departments, or initiatives at Johns Hopkins. Formal Structuring If appropriate, use headings, short paragraphs, or transitions like: “Allow me to outline…” “To this end…” “In line with our shared values…” Include Diplomatic Contact Signature Block Your signature block is very strong and gives legitimacy to the message. Just ensure consistency across all platforms (email, letterhead, etc.). Conclusion This letter exemplifies effective soft power diplomacy, blending academic insight, NGO advocacy, and public health strategy. With slight adjustments in tone, structure, and specificity, it can become a model communication in the evolving field of 21st-century diplomacy. Review of Diplomatic Practice – Ambassador Prof. Muharrem Shabani Your diplomatic correspondence reflects a mature, strategic, and well-informed approach to modern diplomacy, particularly in bridging academic content (surveillance systems) with political advocacy (Kosovo’s recognition at the UN). Below is a structured review of your strengths and areas for further refinement: 1. Diplomatic Strengths ✅ Credibility and Authority You clearly establish your credentials—academic, diplomatic, and institutional. By presenting your affiliations with: The Institut Supérieur de Management et du Tourisme Suisse, The SKUN Foundation, and Your role as an Ambassador for Peace, you demonstrate legitimacy and influence, a foundational aspect of effective diplomatic practice. ✅ Strategic Messaging The letter connects two seemingly distinct fields—surveillance systems and diplomacy—into a coherent narrative. This shows: Analytical skill, Cross-sectoral thinking, Visionary leadership in reframing tools like surveillance for peacebuilding and state recognition. ✅ Multilateral Diplomacy Awareness You incorporate the concept of non-state diplomatic actors (NGOs, academic institutions), aligning with 21st-century multilateral diplomacy trends. The role of the SKUN Foundation is positioned not only as supportive but as a key driver in Kosovo’s international engagement. ✅ Tone and Language Your tone is: Respectful, Collaborative, Professionally warm. This is crucial for building alliances and partnerships, especially in academic and diplomatic contexts. ✅ Call for Dialogue You maintain an open-ended tone at the conclusion, inviting collaboration and further discussion. This respects diplomatic protocol while encouraging academic exchange. 2. Areas for Growth and Practice 🔄 Clarify the Surveillance–Diplomacy Nexus While the conceptual link is present, it can be deepened with: Specific examples of how surveillance systems (e.g., crisis early warning systems, migration data, conflict zones) have influenced foreign policy or UN debates. A brief case study (e.g., Kosovo post-1999, or Ukraine conflict monitoring) could enrich the argument. 🔄 Structural Refinement Consider enhancing the flow by: Introducing clear sub-sections or thematic blocks (e.g., Introduction, Surveillance & Diplomacy, Kosovo’s Case, Collaboration Opportunity). Using more transitional phrases to guide the reader (e.g., “In this context…”, “Therefore, we propose…”). 🔄 Add Specific Follow-Up Actions Instead of a general invitation, you could: Propose a joint webinar or roundtable between Johns Hopkins and SKUN, Suggest a research paper or position brief, Offer a visit or virtual meeting within a specific timeframe. This shows initiative and moves diplomacy from intent to implementation. 🔄 Include Supporting Citations (if academic) If the message is intended for academic or policy professionals, briefly referencing a key publication, UN report, or WHO framework would elevate the intellectual weight of the letter. Overall Evaluation Your practice of diplomacy in this instance reflects: Strategic framing of Kosovo’s international position, Innovative use of technical knowledge (surveillance systems), Mature soft diplomacy through NGO and academic partnerships. This is precisely the kind of multi-dimensional diplomacy necessary in today’s global environment—one that unites education, advocacy, technology, and peacebuilding. Final Recommendation You are on the right path to developing a distinctive diplomatic voice that combines academic rigor with field relevance. If you plan to send this letter formally or use it as a model, I recommend creating a refined final version in official diplomatic style. Would you like me to prepare such a final version of the letter for you, tailored for an academic-diplomatic audience (e.g., Johns Hopkins University)?

Excellent succinct and straight forward course. You would need access to the recommended textbook SATOW’S DIPLOMATIC PRACTICE Seventh Edition (2017) which I did not have. Also, some of the articles recommended online could not be accessed which diminished the richness of my experience.

This class is what I thought it was very precise, full of great information. The instructor is amazing. I learned a lot in this class. I definitely suggest this class.

Un curso excelente. Mucha información de calidad.